PX, REM, and EM Unit Converter: Essential CSS Units Explained

Introduction to CSS Unit Conversion

Understanding and converting between CSS units is essential for responsive web design and development. The PX (pixel), REM (root em), and EM units are fundamental building blocks that determine how elements are sized and positioned across different devices and screen sizes. This comprehensive unit converter tool allows you to easily translate values between these three critical CSS units, helping you create more flexible and maintainable web layouts.

Pixels (PX) are fixed-size units that provide precise control but lack scalability, while REM units scale relative to the root element's font size, and EM units scale relative to their parent element's font size. Converting between these units can be challenging, especially when working with complex designs or when supporting accessibility features like text resizing. Our PX, REM, and EM converter simplifies this process, allowing you to focus on creating beautiful, responsive designs.

Understanding CSS Units: PX, REM, and EM

What are Pixels (PX)?

Pixels (PX) are the most basic and commonly used CSS unit. A pixel is a single point in a digital image grid and represents the smallest controllable element on a screen. In CSS, pixels provide a fixed-size unit of measurement that remains consistent regardless of other styling factors.

1.element {
2  width: 200px;
3  font-size: 16px;
4  margin: 10px;
5}
6

Key characteristics of pixels:

Fixed-size units that don't scale automatically
Provide precise control over element dimensions
Easy to understand and visualize
Less ideal for responsive design and accessibility

What are REM Units?

REM (root em) units are relative units that scale based on the root element's font size (typically the <html> element). By default, most browsers set the root font size to 16px, making 1rem equal to 16px unless explicitly changed.

1html {
2  font-size: 16px; /* Default in most browsers */
3}
4
5.element {
6  width: 12.5rem; /* Equivalent to 200px with default root font size */
7  font-size: 1rem; /* Equivalent to 16px */
8  margin: 0.625rem; /* Equivalent to 10px */
9}
10

Key characteristics of REM units:

Scale relative to the root element's font size
Maintain consistent proportions throughout the document
Support better accessibility through global font size adjustments
Ideal for responsive layouts and typography

What are EM Units?

EM units are relative units that scale based on their parent element's font size. If no font size is specified for the parent, EMs will reference the inherited font size.

1.parent {
2  font-size: 20px;
3}
4
5.child {
6  font-size: 0.8em; /* Equivalent to 16px (20px × 0.8) */
7  margin: 0.5em; /* Equivalent to 8px (16px × 0.5) */
8}
9

Key characteristics of EM units:

Scale relative to their parent element's font size
Create a cascading effect when nested
Useful for creating proportional designs within components
Can become complex to manage with deeply nested elements

Conversion Formulas and Calculations

Understanding the mathematical relationships between PX, REM, and EM units is crucial for accurate conversions. Here are the formulas used in our converter:

PX to REM Conversion

To convert pixels to REM units, divide the pixel value by the root font size:

$REM = \frac{PX}{rootFontSize}$

For example, with the default root font size of 16px:

16px = 1rem
24px = 1.5rem
8px = 0.5rem

PX to EM Conversion

To convert pixels to EM units, divide the pixel value by the parent element's font size:

$EM = \frac{PX}{parentFontSize}$

For example, with a parent font size of 16px:

16px = 1em
24px = 1.5em
8px = 0.5em

REM to PX Conversion

To convert REM units to pixels, multiply the REM value by the root font size:

$PX = REM \times rootFontSize$

For example, with the default root font size of 16px:

1rem = 16px
1.5rem = 24px
0.5rem = 8px

EM to PX Conversion

To convert EM units to pixels, multiply the EM value by the parent element's font size:

$PX = EM \times parentFontSize$

For example, with a parent font size of 16px:

1em = 16px
1.5em = 24px
0.5em = 8px

REM to EM Conversion

To convert REM units to EM units, you need to account for both the root font size and the parent element's font size:

$EM = REM \times \frac{rootFontSize}{parentFontSize}$

If both the root and parent font sizes are the same (e.g., 16px), then 1rem = 1em.

EM to REM Conversion

To convert EM units to REM units, use the following formula:

$REM = EM \times \frac{parentFontSize}{rootFontSize}$

Again, if both font sizes are equal, then 1em = 1rem.

How to Use the PX, REM, and EM Unit Converter

Our unit converter tool makes it easy to translate values between PX, REM, and EM units. Here's a step-by-step guide to using the converter effectively:

Basic Usage

Enter a value in any input field (PX, REM, or EM)
The converter will automatically calculate and display the equivalent values in the other two units
Adjust the root font size (default: 16px) to see how it affects the REM conversions
Adjust the parent font size (default: 16px) to see how it affects the EM conversions
Use the copy button next to each field to copy the value to your clipboard

Advanced Features

Visual comparison: The tool provides a visual representation of the relative sizes of each unit
Precision control: All calculations maintain 4 decimal places for accuracy
Negative values: The converter supports negative values, which are valid in CSS for properties like margins
Real-time updates: Any change to input values or font size settings updates all calculations instantly

Tips for Accurate Conversions

For the most accurate REM conversions, set the root font size to match your project's <html> font-size value
For accurate EM conversions, set the parent font size to match the font size of the parent element you're working with
Remember that browser default font sizes may vary, though 16px is the most common default

Practical Use Cases for CSS Unit Conversion

Understanding when to use each CSS unit and how to convert between them is crucial for effective web development. Here are some practical applications and scenarios where our unit converter proves invaluable:

Responsive Web Design

Converting between units is essential for creating truly responsive designs:

Mobile-first approach: Start with a base design in pixels, then convert to relative units for scalability
Breakpoint management: Use REMs for consistent spacing across different viewport sizes
Component scaling: Ensure UI elements maintain proportional relationships when the viewport changes

1/* Convert fixed pixel values to responsive REM units */
2.container {
3  /* From: padding: 20px; */
4  padding: 1.25rem; /* 20px ÷ 16px = 1.25rem */
5  
6  /* From: margin-bottom: 32px; */
7  margin-bottom: 2rem; /* 32px ÷ 16px = 2rem */
8}
9

Accessibility Enhancements

Using relative units improves accessibility by respecting user preferences:

Text resizing: When users change their browser's font size, REM-based layouts adapt appropriately
Zoom functionality: Relative units ensure designs remain proportional when users zoom in
User preference respect: Layouts based on relative units honor the user's default font size settings

Component-Based Design Systems

Modern design systems benefit from thoughtful unit usage:

Consistent components: Use REM for global spacing and sizing consistency
Self-contained modules: Use EM for elements that should scale with their parent components
Design tokens: Convert between units when implementing design tokens across different contexts

Typography Systems

Creating harmonious typography requires careful unit selection:

Type scales: Define a typographic scale in REMs for consistent progression
Line heights: Use unitless values or EMs for proportional line heights
Responsive text: Adjust font sizes across breakpoints while maintaining proportions

1/* Typography system using REM units */
2h1 { font-size: 2.5rem; }    /* 40px */
3h2 { font-size: 2rem; }      /* 32px */
4h3 { font-size: 1.5rem; }    /* 24px */
5h4 { font-size: 1.25rem; }   /* 20px */
6p { font-size: 1rem; }       /* 16px */
7small { font-size: 0.875rem; } /* 14px */
8

Pixel-Perfect Designs

When implementing designs from tools like Figma or Photoshop:

Design handoff: Convert pixel values from design files to REM/EM for development
Maintaining precision: Ensure exact spacing and sizing while using relative units
Design system integration: Translate pixel-based design tokens to relative units

Alternative CSS Units

While PX, REM, and EM are the most common units, there are alternatives worth considering:

Viewport Units (VW, VH)

VW (viewport width): 1vw equals 1% of the viewport width
VH (viewport height): 1vh equals 1% of the viewport height
Use case: Creating elements that scale directly with the viewport size

Percentage (%)

Relative to the parent element's dimensions
Use case: Fluid layouts and responsive widths

CH Units

Based on the width of the "0" character
Use case: Creating containers with a specific character count per line

EX Units

Based on the height of the lowercase "x" character
Use case: Fine-tuning typography, especially for x-height adjustments

The Evolution of CSS Units in Web Development

The history of CSS units reflects the broader evolution of web design, from static layouts to today's responsive, accessible approaches.

Early Web Design (1990s)

In the early days of CSS, pixels reigned supreme. Web designers created fixed-width layouts, typically 640px or 800px wide to accommodate common screen resolutions. Accessibility and device diversity weren't major concerns, and pixel-perfect control was the primary goal.

The Rise of Fluid Layouts (Early 2000s)

As screen sizes diversified, percentage-based layouts gained popularity. Designers began creating more flexible designs, though typography often remained in pixel units. This era saw the introduction of EM units in CSS, though their adoption was limited due to the complexity of managing cascading font sizes.

Mobile Revolution (2007-2010)

The introduction of the iPhone in 2007 transformed web design. Suddenly, websites needed to work on screens as small as 320px wide. This catalyzed interest in responsive design techniques and relative units. The limitations of EM units (particularly the cascading effect) became more apparent as designs became more complex.

Responsive Web Design Era (2010-2015)

Ethan Marcotte's influential article on responsive web design in 2010 changed how developers approached CSS units. The REM unit was introduced in CSS3, offering the benefits of relative scaling without the cascading complications of EM units. Browser support for REM units grew steadily during this period.

Modern CSS Approaches (2015-Present)

Today's web development embraces a mix of units for different purposes:

REM units for global consistency and accessibility
EM units for component-based scaling
Pixels for borders and precise details
Viewport units for truly responsive elements
CSS calc() function for combining different unit types

This evolution reflects the web's transition from a document-based medium to a complex application platform that must work across countless devices and contexts.

Code Examples for Unit Conversion

JavaScript Unit Converter Functions

1// Convert between PX, REM, and EM units
2const pxToRem = (px, rootFontSize = 16) => {
3  return px / rootFontSize;
4};
5
6const pxToEm = (px, parentFontSize = 16) => {
7  return px / parentFontSize;
8};
9
10const remToPx = (rem, rootFontSize = 16) => {
11  return rem * rootFontSize;
12};
13
14const emToPx = (em, parentFontSize = 16) => {
15  return em * parentFontSize;
16};
17
18const remToEm = (rem, rootFontSize = 16, parentFontSize = 16) => {
19  return rem * (rootFontSize / parentFontSize);
20};
21
22const emToRem = (em, parentFontSize = 16, rootFontSize = 16) => {
23  return em * (parentFontSize / rootFontSize);
24};
25
26// Example usage
27console.log(pxToRem(24));  // 1.5
28console.log(remToPx(1.5)); // 24
29console.log(pxToEm(24, 24)); // 1
30console.log(remToEm(2, 16, 32)); // 1
31

CSS Custom Properties for Unit Conversion

1:root {
2  /* Base font sizes */
3  --root-font-size: 16px;
4  --base-font-size: var(--root-font-size);
5  
6  /* Common pixel values converted to REM */
7  --space-4px: 0.25rem;
8  --space-8px: 0.5rem;
9  --space-16px: 1rem;
10  --space-24px: 1.5rem;
11  --space-32px: 2rem;
12  --space-48px: 3rem;
13  
14  /* Typography scale */
15  --text-xs: 0.75rem;    /* 12px */
16  --text-sm: 0.875rem;   /* 14px */
17  --text-base: 1rem;     /* 16px */
18  --text-lg: 1.125rem;   /* 18px */
19  --text-xl: 1.25rem;    /* 20px */
20  --text-2xl: 1.5rem;    /* 24px */
21}
22
23/* Usage example */
24.card {
25  padding: var(--space-16px);
26  margin-bottom: var(--space-24px);
27  font-size: var(--text-base);
28}
29
30.card-title {
31  font-size: var(--text-xl);
32  margin-bottom: var(--space-8px);
33}
34

SCSS Mixins for Unit Conversion

1// SCSS functions for unit conversion
2@function px-to-rem($px, $root-font-size: 16) {
3  @return ($px / $root-font-size) * 1rem;
4}
5
6@function px-to-em($px, $parent-font-size: 16) {
7  @return ($px / $parent-font-size) * 1em;
8}
9
10@function rem-to-px($rem, $root-font-size: 16) {
11  @return $rem * $root-font-size * 1px;
12}
13
14// Usage example
15.element {
16  padding: px-to-rem(20);
17  margin: px-to-rem(32);
18  font-size: px-to-rem(18);
19  
20  .nested {
21    // Using parent font size (18px) for em conversion
22    padding: px-to-em(16, 18);
23    margin-bottom: px-to-em(24, 18);
24  }
25}
26

Python Unit Converter

1def px_to_rem(px, root_font_size=16):
2    """Convert pixels to REM units"""
3    return px / root_font_size
4
5def rem_to_px(rem, root_font_size=16):
6    """Convert REM units to pixels"""
7    return rem * root_font_size
8
9def px_to_em(px, parent_font_size=16):
10    """Convert pixels to EM units"""
11    return px / parent_font_size
12
13def em_to_px(em, parent_font_size=16):
14    """Convert EM units to pixels"""
15    return em * parent_font_size
16
17# Example usage
18print(f"16px = {px_to_rem(16)}rem")  # 16px = 1.0rem
19print(f"2rem = {rem_to_px(2)}px")    # 2rem = 32px
20print(f"24px = {px_to_em(24, 16)}em")  # 24px = 1.5em
21

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between REM and EM units?

REM (root em) units are relative to the root element's font size (typically the <html> element), while EM units are relative to their parent element's font size. This key difference means REM units maintain consistent sizing throughout your document regardless of nesting, while EM units can create a compounding effect when elements are nested.

Which CSS unit is best for responsive design?

There's no single "best" unit for all situations. A combination of units is typically most effective:

REM units for typography and consistent spacing
EM units for component-specific scaling
Percentage or viewport units for layout widths
Pixels for borders and small details

The ideal approach is to use each unit for what it does best within a cohesive system.

Why do browsers default to 16px font size?

The 16px default was established as a readability standard that works well across devices. Research has shown that text around 16px is optimal for reading on screens at typical viewing distances. This default also provides a good baseline for accessibility, ensuring text isn't too small for most users.

Can I use negative values with these units?

Yes, CSS supports negative values for many properties using any unit type. Negative margins, translations, and positions are common use cases for negative values. Our converter handles negative values correctly for all unit types.

How do EM units work with nested elements?

EM units compound when elements are nested. For example:

1.parent {
2  font-size: 16px;
3}
4.child {
5  font-size: 1.5em; /* 24px (16px × 1.5) */
6}
7.grandchild {
8  font-size: 1.5em; /* 36px (24px × 1.5) */
9}
10

This compounding effect can be useful for creating proportional designs but requires careful management to avoid unintended scaling.

How do I handle high-DPI (Retina) displays with CSS units?

High-DPI displays are handled automatically when using relative units like REM and EM. Since these units are based on the font size rather than physical pixels, they scale appropriately on high-resolution screens. For images and borders, consider using media queries with device-pixel-ratio or resolution.

Should I use REM or EM for media queries?

Browser support for REM and EM units in media queries has improved significantly. Using EM units in media queries is generally recommended because:

They're relative to the browser's default font size
They respect the user's font size preferences
They provide consistent breakpoints across browsers

1/* Using EM units for media queries */
2@media (min-width: 48em) {  /* 768px with 16px base */
3  /* Tablet styles */
4}
5
6@media (min-width: 64em) {  /* 1024px with 16px base */
7  /* Desktop styles */
8}
9

How do I convert between units in design tools like Figma or Sketch?

Most design tools work primarily with pixels. When implementing designs:

Note the root font size of your project (typically 16px)
Divide pixel values by the root font size to get REM values
For EM values, divide by the parent element's font size
Consider creating design tokens or variables for common values

Some design tools have plugins that can help with this conversion process automatically.

How do browsers handle subpixel rendering with relative units?

Browsers handle subpixel values differently. Some browsers round to the nearest pixel, while others support subpixel rendering for smoother scaling. This can occasionally cause slight inconsistencies across browsers, especially with small REM/EM values or when using transforms. For most use cases, these differences are negligible.

What's the performance impact of using different CSS units?

There's no significant performance difference between using pixels, REM, or EM units in modern browsers. The choice of units should be based on design requirements, responsive behavior, and accessibility needs rather than performance considerations.

References and Further Reading

"CSS Values and Units Module Level 3." W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-3/
Marcotte, Ethan. "Responsive Web Design." A List Apart, May 25, 2010. https://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design/
Rutter, Richard. "The Elements of Typographic Style Applied to the Web." http://webtypography.net/
"CSS Units." MDN Web Docs. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/Building_blocks/Values_and_units
"CSS Pixels vs. Physical Pixels." Stack Overflow Documentation. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8785643/what-exactly-is-the-difference-between-css-pixels-and-device-pixels
Coyier, Chris. "The Lengths of CSS." CSS-Tricks. https://css-tricks.com/the-lengths-of-css/
"Using CSS custom properties (variables)." MDN Web Docs. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Using_CSS_custom_properties
"Understanding and Using rem Units in CSS." SitePoint. https://www.sitepoint.com/understanding-and-using-rem-units-in-css/

Try Our Unit Converter Today

Stop struggling with manual CSS unit conversions and let our PX, REM, and EM Unit Converter do the work for you. Whether you're building a responsive website, creating a design system, or just learning about CSS units, this tool will save you time and ensure accuracy. Enter your values now to see how easy unit conversion can be!

PX to REM to EM Converter: CSS Units Calculator

PX, REM, and EM Unit Converter

Conversion Formulas

Documentation